Saturday, August 09, 2008
All for one

Years into this pretentious reform 'movement', the Maldives has yet to score big on real change. Sure there is a new constitution. There is a purported multiparty political system. Yet, nothing has changed.

The amendment of the old constitution was inevitable given that Maumoon would want his exit to be marked by a great political success. He will forever be known as the president who gave Maldives a party system and a brand new constitution to boot whether anyone likes it or not. He will forever be written in the books of history as the purveyor of democracy in Maldives.

The party system itself is just for namesakes. It is through that the system helps potential political figures to rise up through the party ranks into the top two offices. Thereafter the parties are simply ineffectual. The parties do not serve in constituting a greater oversight body (such as the senate in the US, which is responsible for separating the judicial concerns from the constitutional concerns) which acts as a check-and-balance against the government. The party system is not even involved in the constitution of the parliament (and this is compounded by the parliament's indirect involvement in the composition of the judiciary). All this aside, the parties are doing nothing to apply pressure on existing governments to make changes.

Pressure is not all about demonstrating on the roads under banners and invisible clouds of hatred. Demonstrations are only tools for asserting predetermined theses. Why theses you ask?

Has any party published a study of the financial situation in Maldives in terms of inflation, income, expenditure and loss/corruption? Sure, we hear the term 'corruption' being tossed around like so many tuna from the richest schools out their in the oceans of Maldives. However, has anyone quantified this term? Has anyone embarked on a study to determine the level of corruption and the possible prevention mechanisms? Furthermore, has anyone published any such studies?

With regards to the economy, the research of the purported think-tanks of Maldives yielded such money-guzzling, corruption-inducing plans as creating ever-widening infrastructure. Anni with his transportation infrastructure, Hassan Saeed with his decentralizing infrastructure and Umar Naseer with his residential infrastructure. All these plans will only consume money that we do not have, resulting in ever-increasing debt.

The proposed societal development schemes fare no better. Every politician is hell-bent on gaining more support by promising freebies. Free education, free medical care and free recreational infrastructure. All these promises will only result in further borrowings, allowing capitalists to reserve their pounds of flesh.

It seems that the philosophy of borrowing for development has been imbued in all Maldivians. Why else would these so-called leftist parties be adopting such congruent principles as those of the government when it comes to development? Why have political discourse at all?!

Borrowing can be lessened only through streamlining expenses and working towards a break-even. This means delving into the budgets and determining wastage first. For instance, do you ever wonder why each ministry deploys a whole barrage of computers and internetworking equipment in their offices each year? This is not because the existing ones are obsolete. It is because they have become tech-junkies combined with the procurement officers' desires for continuous commissions. Why else would each department purchase more equipment a year on average than competitive service providers like Dhiraagu?

As for financing development, if these leftist parties are truly concerned about Maldives they would empower the citizens with the country's financial concerns. The simple means for this is a taxation system. At least then the people will truly gain the ownership of various disputes.

Taxing is also the simple means of solving housing problems too. A rental tax graded across rent bands (lower rents having lower taxes and prorating upwards) will help maintain lower rents and prevent realty values from sky-rocketing.

Taxing will also be the ideal route to a quick resolution to the current housing problems. If a land rent were charged in Male', people would be less willing to own land there. Thus, the value of land in Male' would be less likely to continue escalating (of course, I do not have the exact projections to determine the type of taxation or grading). Furthermore, if land taxes in places like Addu, Haa Alif, etc were considerably lower than Male', that land there would obviously be more attractive to new families. Taxation would also help leverage basic infrastructure development such as schools and hospitals (which addresses your doubts about people living in Addu or Haa Alif on grounds of the lack of infrastructure).

Finally, no one has substantially published on reducing income polarities. Everyone knows about the earnings of the few hugely outweighing the earnings of the many. However, no one has truly stated the numbers, and no one is willing to study the possible alternatives to these income polarities.

Why these studies are not conducted, or if conducted not published is the failure of the leftist parties. It is not enough to simply lay blame on the government and idle by. When I queried one of the leaders of these leftist parties he excused his inaction as being a strategy to prevent the government from adopting their plans to enact preemptive change. This can only be interpreted as the leaderships' desires for returns on their political investments. It would seem that their philosophies are not all that different from those of the present government's. These people are only out to attain benefits from their politics: not to empower the people.

What I want as a voter is a change in the leftist philosophies. If these leftist parties are too concerned about gaining power I will simply vote for Maumoon. Especially given that the rest of the leaderships are rife with incompetents. I do not want change for the sake of change. I want change that reflects a sustained improvement in the conditions of life in Maldives. Prove that and I will reconsider.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

I am sure you will be following the policies parties have already statred unveiling. I am afraid you sound just a little bit out of date with developments on policy positions being adopted by parties, most visibly by the MDP over the last 2 weeks.

persona non grata said...

Dear anonymous@3:19pm,

I have kept a close eye on the publications of MDP as well as every other political party. Your claim on MDP's prowess is a falsity as far as documented studies are concerned. No one is disputing that MDP and its leaders did not cry foul over corruption. I am saying they aren't concerned enough to actually delve into the matter and yield quantitative proof.

Coming back to being out of date, give me a single mandate (not a rebuttal or opinion piece) published over the past 2 weeks by MDP which concerns anything other than the improvement of the conditions of the party. Until you do, comments like this are no different than the futile pleas for votes by MDP and the rest of the leftists.

Oh, let me pass on a bit of insider information to you. MDP's leader claims that it is a middle-right party. In other words they're intending to lean towards conservatism in all contexts - including the current government's philosophies on execution of economic affairs.